During the 80's and 90's Galicia, a region in Northern Spain, suffered a wave of drug-dealing. In 2012 a reporter wrote a book about real facts as a chronic.
Last month one of the real persons who appeared in the book, sued the author because he wrote about a fact he could not prove real. As a result, the book has been retired and there are still trials about the topic. When defaming, should this be the correct way to act?
Last month one of the real persons who appeared in the book, sued the author because he wrote about a fact he could not prove real. As a result, the book has been retired and there are still trials about the topic. When defaming, should this be the correct way to act?
No comments:
Post a Comment